Assumptions for battery carbon footprint for comparison of light powered electronic shelf label and remote control.
Carbon footprint of Epishine LEH3_50x50_6_10: 37.1 g CO2eq
Assumptions for battery carbon footprint for comparison of light powered electronic shelf label and remote control.
Carbon footprint of Epishine LEH3_50x50_6_10: 37.1 g CO2eq
Light powered carbon footprint up to 85% lower than battery powered
Light powered carbon footprint up to 80% lower than battery powered
Sources
1 Life Cycle Analysis of AA Alkaline Batteries, Hamade et. al, Procedia Manufacturing 43, 2020,415-422, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.02.193
2 Internal Thesis work at Epishine based on MSDS and rescaling of larger LiMnO2 batteries